Skip to main content

What is Privacy?

Privacy in the age of technology has been redefined and we no longer have the same privacy our grandparents grew up with. Instead, each and everyone one of us has to come to terms with being monitored and having data collected on them. What really creates a problem in my mind is that some people are unaware, specifically on social media.

Not everyone is fully aware of what it means to be on social media when they sign up, especially minors. Just by creating profiles and being on the Internet, they subject themselves to data mining and collecting they are unaware they've signed off on. It's a scary thought that before the age of 18, someone can have a well established online presence and have created a large digital footprint without ever being aware of the possible repercussions or who is listening in.

Everyday average citizens remain unaware as well. From the license plate scanners that police use to the data mining on all sorts of Internet sites, privacy is an illusion. We, specifically as Americans, have very little control over what the government knows about us or can know about us. In terms of social media, however, there are a few things we can do.

Adjusting our privacy settings to the public is really one of our only easier options. Making sure that the general public can't view our private information is important. It's also important that we keep up our social media profiles as long as they are active to ensure we control the narrative.

Privacy is a thing we now have to put in more effort than ever to maintain. We must be aware of the risks and make ourselves knowledgable. The world is changing quickly with the continuous development of technology. Whether that's a good or bad thing is up to you to decide.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Recap and Review

After an entire semester of blogging for my Media Law and Literacy, I've learned a bit about the power of blogging. Blogging is essentially a form of citizen journalism and allows everyday citizens to act as gatekeeepers. It allows anyone to share their knowledge or creative ideas to entertain, persuade, and inform others. While I may not continue blogging like this in the future, it's given me a better appreciation of what blogging can do and how important it is, especially in the world of social media. So many different avenues of sharing information have become available since technology has involved so drastically but this one sticks out. Its completely customizable and usable for everyone. I hope that the people who use blogging use it for the right reasons. While it can be used to spread false information, it can also be used to spread truth and creativity. It shouldn't be stifled and we should be promoting this form of freedom of speech.

Why Instagram is Revolutionary

Social media, over the past few years, has spread like wildfire. There are more social media apps than we know what to do with and more ways to connect with others than we can count. The platform that seems to be steadily at the top of the social media game, however, is Instagram. Using Everett Rogers' theory of Diffusion of Innovations, it's possible to take a closer look at why Instagram is the powerhouse it is. Facebook was the first platform to really make it easy for communities to connect online. Instagram allowed for similar features but, since being taken over by Facebook, they've come to allow many more communication features. Instagram allows people to follow others and post pictures of what's going on in their lives. The pictures make more of a statement than a status update and it really sets Instagram apart. It's gotten so popular because of its ability to connect others from halfway around the world and its ability to inspire creativity. The younge...

Supreme Court

The prestige of the Supreme Court wasn't always what we think of it as today. In years past, The Supreme Court has had its ups and downs but two major ideologies have the court have emerged. The Court usually practices either judicial restraint or judicial activism. I've tried to think about which mentality of the Supreme Court I would prefer. On one hand, the Supreme Court could practice judicial restraint and be conservative with their judicial review resulting in slow or no change. On the other hand, it could practice judicial activism and liberal use of judicial review resulting in rapid or sweeping change. This would mean an increase in court decision strike downs and overturned precedents. After some thought, I think judicial activism is the way to go. I've grown up watching a very judicially active court and I think change is necessary to push this country forward, especially when we see wrong being done or this country's ideals not being upheld. Under th...