Skip to main content

The Social Media Tax

We should all consider ourselves lucky to live in the U.S. and have the first amendment protecting our free speech. Uganda isn't so lucky. Recently, the Ugandan government implemented a "social media tax" which affects more than 60 online platforms, including big names like Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter. The tax is 200 Ugandan shillings a day.

The government revealed their reasoning behind the tax to be that of wanting to cut down "idle talk" and raise revenue for the government and Uganda itself. The plan didn't exactly pan out, though, because, within three months, the number of Ugandan internet subscriptions fell by 2.5 million. I don't think the Ugandan government is going to be raking in the revenue that had hoped they would...


While the government did outline they're apparent reasons for this social media tasks, outsiders think that there might be alternative motives. An election year isn't too far away for the people of Uganda and this really may just be a ploy to limit free speech for that exact election. Depending on who is elected, the Ugandan people won't be surprised if they find more of their freedoms and rights dwindling.

Whatever the reason behind the social media tax is, Uganda is now way out of the loop. With the world today being so technologically advanced and connected through social media and the internet, the general population of Uganda won't be able to stay as informed or connected with people in other parts of the world. In my opinion, it really does seem like the Ugandan government is making strides to cut off the country from the outside world.

I don't think, thankfully, a tax like this would fly here in the United States because people would riot in the streets but it definitely makes you grateful for the first amendment and our freedom of speech.

For more information on this story, subscribe to the DailySkimm which is where I first heard the story, but also check out The Guardian.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court

The prestige of the Supreme Court wasn't always what we think of it as today. In years past, The Supreme Court has had its ups and downs but two major ideologies have the court have emerged. The Court usually practices either judicial restraint or judicial activism. I've tried to think about which mentality of the Supreme Court I would prefer. On one hand, the Supreme Court could practice judicial restraint and be conservative with their judicial review resulting in slow or no change. On the other hand, it could practice judicial activism and liberal use of judicial review resulting in rapid or sweeping change. This would mean an increase in court decision strike downs and overturned precedents. After some thought, I think judicial activism is the way to go. I've grown up watching a very judicially active court and I think change is necessary to push this country forward, especially when we see wrong being done or this country's ideals not being upheld. Under th

What is Privacy?

Privacy in the age of technology has been redefined and we no longer have the same privacy our grandparents grew up with. Instead, each and everyone one of us has to come to terms with being monitored and having data collected on them. What really creates a problem in my mind is that some people are unaware, specifically on social media. Not everyone is fully aware of what it means to be on social media when they sign up, especially minors. Just by creating profiles and being on the Internet, they subject themselves to data mining and collecting they are unaware they've signed off on. It's a scary thought that before the age of 18, someone can have a well established online presence and have created a large digital footprint without ever being aware of the possible repercussions or who is listening in. Everyday average citizens remain unaware as well. From the license plate scanners that police use to the data mining on all sorts of Internet sites, privacy is an illusion.

The Future of Pinterest

Not too long ago, Pinterest announced that they would be launching, or aiming to launch, their first IPO later this year. Predictions for how the company will do because of this IPO are all over the place. Similarly to Facebook, they could go public and only continue to grow and succeed. Twitter did pretty much the opposite after launching their IPO and hasn't quite been the same ever since. With trends changing every day and attention spans being shorter than ever, the social media game is hard to predict. The thing that sets Pinterest apart, though, is that Pinterest is set apart. I meant there's no other social media site/app that has or does exactly what Pinterest does. There are no "statuses" and it really caters a more creative audience than Facebook or Instagram do sometimes. One article I read, however, said that while Pinterest is definitely unique, they do have one major risk to face: Google. It seems Google has been watching Pinterest pretty intent