Skip to main content

The Social Media Tax

We should all consider ourselves lucky to live in the U.S. and have the first amendment protecting our free speech. Uganda isn't so lucky. Recently, the Ugandan government implemented a "social media tax" which affects more than 60 online platforms, including big names like Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter. The tax is 200 Ugandan shillings a day.

The government revealed their reasoning behind the tax to be that of wanting to cut down "idle talk" and raise revenue for the government and Uganda itself. The plan didn't exactly pan out, though, because, within three months, the number of Ugandan internet subscriptions fell by 2.5 million. I don't think the Ugandan government is going to be raking in the revenue that had hoped they would...


While the government did outline they're apparent reasons for this social media tasks, outsiders think that there might be alternative motives. An election year isn't too far away for the people of Uganda and this really may just be a ploy to limit free speech for that exact election. Depending on who is elected, the Ugandan people won't be surprised if they find more of their freedoms and rights dwindling.

Whatever the reason behind the social media tax is, Uganda is now way out of the loop. With the world today being so technologically advanced and connected through social media and the internet, the general population of Uganda won't be able to stay as informed or connected with people in other parts of the world. In my opinion, it really does seem like the Ugandan government is making strides to cut off the country from the outside world.

I don't think, thankfully, a tax like this would fly here in the United States because people would riot in the streets but it definitely makes you grateful for the first amendment and our freedom of speech.

For more information on this story, subscribe to the DailySkimm which is where I first heard the story, but also check out The Guardian.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Recap and Review

After an entire semester of blogging for my Media Law and Literacy, I've learned a bit about the power of blogging. Blogging is essentially a form of citizen journalism and allows everyday citizens to act as gatekeeepers. It allows anyone to share their knowledge or creative ideas to entertain, persuade, and inform others. While I may not continue blogging like this in the future, it's given me a better appreciation of what blogging can do and how important it is, especially in the world of social media. So many different avenues of sharing information have become available since technology has involved so drastically but this one sticks out. Its completely customizable and usable for everyone. I hope that the people who use blogging use it for the right reasons. While it can be used to spread false information, it can also be used to spread truth and creativity. It shouldn't be stifled and we should be promoting this form of freedom of speech.

Supreme Court

The prestige of the Supreme Court wasn't always what we think of it as today. In years past, The Supreme Court has had its ups and downs but two major ideologies have the court have emerged. The Court usually practices either judicial restraint or judicial activism. I've tried to think about which mentality of the Supreme Court I would prefer. On one hand, the Supreme Court could practice judicial restraint and be conservative with their judicial review resulting in slow or no change. On the other hand, it could practice judicial activism and liberal use of judicial review resulting in rapid or sweeping change. This would mean an increase in court decision strike downs and overturned precedents. After some thought, I think judicial activism is the way to go. I've grown up watching a very judicially active court and I think change is necessary to push this country forward, especially when we see wrong being done or this country's ideals not being upheld. Under th...

Whistleblowers: The Heroes Behind Bars

After learning more about key media law terms and concepts, I realized that one stuck out to me. The concept of a whistleblower, while I knew what one was before, was a bit foreign to me and I didn't realize just how important and close to home they can hit. With Julian Assange being the main news story these days, I found it important to familiarize myself with not only his story, but the terms associated with the current news cycle. Whistleblowers have made waves, especially in United States history. In a lot of people's eyes, they're heroes. They serve the people by uncovering and revealing injustice, dishonesty, and wrongdoing. While that is a good thing, especially for the American public, it often means that we lose faith in our elected officials. The concept and threat of a whistleblower hold them to higher standards and keeps the public informed so that we can help to hold them to those standards. Some of history's most famous whistleblowers include Mark...